10 results for 'cat:"Civil Procedure" AND cat:"Civil Rights" AND cat:"Education"'.
J. Cogburn grants a school district’s motion to dismiss civil rights violations allegations brought against it by a student’s parents, who proceed pro se. According to federal civil procedure, the parents of a minor must name the child as the party of interest even if they are proceeding on the minor’s behalf. The parents in this case have failed to do so. Also, parents may not proceed pro se in federal court. However, the parents’ complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Cogburn, Filed On: May 14, 2024, Case #: 3:24cv7, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, education
Per curiam, the circuit finds that the district court properly dismissed Title IX claims stemming from Columbia University's investigation of a sexual assault reported against a coed by another student. The coed's "deliberate indifference" charge failed in light of university protocols for handling allegations of peer harassment, and while she may have advocated for different procedures, Title IX did not give her the right to make particular remedial demands. Meanwhile, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying her third attempt to amend and dismissing her claim with prejudice. Affirmed.
Court: 2nd Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 23-960-cv, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, education
J. Easterbrook finds that the lower court improperly found for the university on a male student's sex discrimination claims stemming from its investigation of sexual assault claims against him. The student never explained what remedy he seeks, and this suit is not a live claim unless compensatory damages are available for him. Further, it remains a question whether the student is entitled to proceed anonymously in this case, as the lower court must conduct a hearing on whether the revelation of the student's name will also identify his alleged victim. Vacated.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Easterbrook, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 22-2925, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, education
J. Eifert grants the university's motion for a protective order relating to to the deposition of the university’s president in a student's civil rights suit claiming the university retaliated against her by charging her with violating the Student Code of Conduct for underage drinking after she reported being sexually assaulted by a fellow student at an off-campus watch party. Since she has not shown any "special, additional, or unique information" the president may have on how the university has implemented Title IX polices aside from what others in his administration provided, the court prohibits the student from taking his deposition.
Court: USDC Southern District of West Virginia, Judge: Eifert, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv532, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, education
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Russell partially grants the defendant school district's dismissal motion in this lawsuit brought by a former high school student alleging that he was sexually harassed by a teacher. The complaint contends that school officials had previously received reports of the teacher engaging in "inappropriate behavior," and that the school district's indifference allowed the student "to become another victim." The student's Section 1983 claim based on a "state created danger theory" will be dismissed, however, along with his Title IX claim, due to a failure to state a plausible claim.
Court: USDC Western District of Oklahoma , Judge: Russell, Filed On: December 29, 2023, Case #: 5:23cv473, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, education
J. Howell denies a former graduate student’s attempt to disqualify counsel of another party — an allegedly abusive teaching assistant — after the graduate student brought a civil rights suit against the University of Texas. The graduate student argues the counsel should be disqualified because she had contacted the firm before filing her suit, creating a conflict. Disqualification is not mandatory in this case, because while the grad student argues this court should use its discretionary power to disqualify the attorney anyways, the danger of prejudice is “exceedingly minimal” and the law firm has “done everything within its power” to prevent it.
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Howell, Filed On: December 11, 2023, Case #: 1:21cv1040, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, education
J. Russell grants the defendant entities' dismissal motions in this lawsuit brought by high school students alleging that they were subjected to "sexual assault and pervasive sexual harassment." They assert claims for breach of contract and violations of Title IX. However, the claims against the board of trustees are duplicative of those against the school. The students also fail to state plausible claims against the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City or the Sisters of Mercy of the Americas South Central Community. The student plaintiffs are allowed to seek leave to amend in accordance with the rules of civil procedure.
Court: USDC Western District of Oklahoma , Judge: Russell, Filed On: August 21, 2023, Case #: 5:22cv992, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Procedure, civil Rights, education